<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ParenScript vs script.aculo.us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/</link>
	<description>Infrequently updated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:24:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hunter Jerowski</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter Jerowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 01:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>Hello, I came across this article while searching for help with JavaScript. I have recently switched browsers from Chrome to Microsoft IE 6. Now I seem to have a issue with loading JavaScript. Everytime I browse website that needs Javascript, my browser doesn&#039;t load and I get a &quot;runtime error javascript.JSException: Unknown name&quot;. I can&#039;t seem to find out how to fix it. Any aid is greatly appreciated! Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I came across this article while searching for help with JavaScript. I have recently switched browsers from Chrome to Microsoft IE 6. Now I seem to have a issue with loading JavaScript. Everytime I browse website that needs Javascript, my browser doesn&#8217;t load and I get a &#8220;runtime error javascript.JSException: Unknown name&#8221;. I can&#8217;t seem to find out how to fix it. Any aid is greatly appreciated! Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudi</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4661</link>
		<dc:creator>rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 09:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4661</guid>
		<description>My pleasure, Ron! Glad I could help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My pleasure, Ron! Glad I could help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Lusk</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4659</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Lusk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4659</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your original posting.  I borrowed the code and managed to set up a timed slideshow with it, with new list items being inserted into the head of a list and the oldest photo fading from the end of the list.  This was a great help, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your original posting.  I borrowed the code and managed to set up a timed slideshow with it, with new list items being inserted into the head of a list and the oldest photo fading from the end of the list.  This was a great help, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raoul Duke</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4628</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4628</guid>
		<description>many thanks for this blog entry; i&#039;m new to all things lisp (well, new in that is has been like 20 years since i last used it for my day job) and posts like this are a great help in getting my bearings. i want to learn enough to be able to cobble together weekend AJAXy hacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>many thanks for this blog entry; i&#8217;m new to all things lisp (well, new in that is has been like 20 years since i last used it for my day job) and posts like this are a great help in getting my bearings. i want to learn enough to be able to cobble together weekend AJAXy hacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edi Weitz</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4621</link>
		<dc:creator>Edi Weitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4621</guid>
		<description>Regarding the single tags, see here:

http://weitz.de/cl-who/#*html-empty-tags*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the single tags, see here:</p>
<p><a href="http://weitz.de/cl-who/#" rel="nofollow">http://weitz.de/cl-who/#</a>*html-empty-tags*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudi</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4623</link>
		<dc:creator>rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4623</guid>
		<description>No no, the documentation is very nice, and well-structured!  If you wikify it, please consider keeping the official docs as well.  In fact, I volunteer to convert the manual to hunchentoot / cl-who.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no, the documentation is very nice, and well-structured!  If you wikify it, please consider keeping the official docs as well.  In fact, I volunteer to convert the manual to hunchentoot / cl-who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladimir Sedach</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4622</link>
		<dc:creator>Vladimir Sedach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4622</guid>
		<description>Arghh, sorry for the documentation! I&#039;ve just moved to California last week and with all the running around trying to find an apartment and getting everything figured out I haven&#039;t had time to touch Parenscript at all. One of the things I promised a few months ago was to rewrite the tutorial file to use Hunchentoot and cl-who, and post it as a wiki page, ostensibly so people can easily contribute great examples like the above, but really because I am too lazy to maintain that much documentation. I&#039;ll put that on the list of things to do before 2007 is out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arghh, sorry for the documentation! I&#8217;ve just moved to California last week and with all the running around trying to find an apartment and getting everything figured out I haven&#8217;t had time to touch Parenscript at all. One of the things I promised a few months ago was to rewrite the tutorial file to use Hunchentoot and cl-who, and post it as a wiki page, ostensibly so people can easily contribute great examples like the above, but really because I am too lazy to maintain that much documentation. I&#8217;ll put that on the list of things to do before 2007 is out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4624</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4624</guid>
		<description>Hmm... quite interesting.  I think, I shall try to use Parenscript and Yahoo UI toolkit together to see if the match as neatly as script.aculo.us in the example.

Thanks for a nice tip!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230; quite interesting.  I think, I shall try to use Parenscript and Yahoo UI toolkit together to see if the match as neatly as script.aculo.us in the example.</p>
<p>Thanks for a nice tip!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aankhen</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4625</link>
		<dc:creator>Aankhen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4625</guid>
		<description>&quot;cl-who renders tags without content as a single , not as a pair of begin/end tags. I found out through experimentation that firefox barfed in that case and would render an empty page.&quot;

Ah yes, you have a point there.  Strange to say, though, I had the opposite experience when I once tried an empty `script&#039; element: IE barfed while Firefox handled it alright.

&quot;I considered reading up on / tweaking the DOCTYPE declaration since it might be within its rights to do so, but went for the quick hack instead.&quot;

It&#039;s not the DOCTYPE in this case.  Browsers treat all HTML as tag soup (unless it&#039;s sent as `application/xhtml+xml&#039;); when you say , their safest bet is to assume that you actually meant  (i.e. just the opening tag).

&quot;the &quot;type=&quot; came from the scriptaculous demos, the &quot;language=&quot; from the parenscript documentation. You may now conclude that I&#039;m not a very advanced web coding monkey.&quot;

Heh, fair enough.

&quot;The js-script macro was adapted from the parenscript docs (see relevant comment above about my web-fu).&quot;

I would yell at you for cargo-culting if I weren&#039;t guilty myself of doing the same thing on a regular basis. :-P

Thanks for fixing the quotes and the escaping, it&#039;s much more usable now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;cl-who renders tags without content as a single , not as a pair of begin/end tags. I found out through experimentation that firefox barfed in that case and would render an empty page.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah yes, you have a point there.  Strange to say, though, I had the opposite experience when I once tried an empty `script&#8217; element: IE barfed while Firefox handled it alright.</p>
<p>&#8220;I considered reading up on / tweaking the DOCTYPE declaration since it might be within its rights to do so, but went for the quick hack instead.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the DOCTYPE in this case.  Browsers treat all HTML as tag soup (unless it&#8217;s sent as `application/xhtml+xml&#8217;); when you say , their safest bet is to assume that you actually meant  (i.e. just the opening tag).</p>
<p>&#8220;the &#8220;type=&#8221; came from the scriptaculous demos, the &#8220;language=&#8221; from the parenscript documentation. You may now conclude that I&#8217;m not a very advanced web coding monkey.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heh, fair enough.</p>
<p>&#8220;The js-script macro was adapted from the parenscript docs (see relevant comment above about my web-fu).&#8221;</p>
<p>I would yell at you for cargo-culting if I weren&#8217;t guilty myself of doing the same thing on a regular basis. <img src='http://constantly.at/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks for fixing the quotes and the escaping, it&#8217;s much more usable now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudi</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2007/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/comment-page-1/#comment-4626</link>
		<dc:creator>rudi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2007/12/12/parenscript-vs-scriptaculous/#comment-4626</guid>
		<description>Hi, thanks for the comments!

cl-who renders tags without content as a single &lt;tag /&gt;, not as a pair of begin/end tags. I found out through experimentation that firefox barfed in that case and would render an empty page.  I considered reading up on / tweaking the DOCTYPE declaration since it might be within its rights to do so, but went for the quick hack instead.

the &quot;type=&quot; came from the scriptaculous demos, the &quot;language=&quot; from the parenscript documentation. You may now conclude that I&#039;m not a very advanced web coding monkey.

The js-script macro was adapted from the parenscript docs (see relevant comment above about my web-fu).

Glad to be of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, thanks for the comments!</p>
<p>cl-who renders tags without content as a single <tag />, not as a pair of begin/end tags. I found out through experimentation that firefox barfed in that case and would render an empty page.  I considered reading up on / tweaking the DOCTYPE declaration since it might be within its rights to do so, but went for the quick hack instead.</p>
<p>the &#8220;type=&#8221; came from the scriptaculous demos, the &#8220;language=&#8221; from the parenscript documentation. You may now conclude that I&#8217;m not a very advanced web coding monkey.</p>
<p>The js-script macro was adapted from the parenscript docs (see relevant comment above about my web-fu).</p>
<p>Glad to be of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
