<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>constantly.at &#187; Lisp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constantly.at/tag/lisp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constantly.at</link>
	<description>Infrequently updated</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>On tail recursion</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2009/05/on-tail-recursion/</link>
		<comments>http://constantly.at/2009/05/on-tail-recursion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rudi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lisp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like many, I was not very interested in tail recursion &#8211; it&#8217;s just a way of writing a loop in a more verbose way, right? Â Luckily, Joe Marshall wrote a series of blog posts that made me reconsider my view &#8211; while self-calls might &#8220;only&#8221; be loops, mutual, never-ending tail-calls implement continuation-passing style, state machines [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like many, I was not very interested in tail recursion &#8211; it&#8217;s just a way of writing a loop in a more verbose way, right? Â Luckily, <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/">Joe Marshall</a> <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/04/you-knew-id-say-something.html">wrote</a> <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/04/you-knew-id-say-something-part-ii.html">a</a> <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/05/interlude.html">series</a> <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/05/you-knew-id-say-something-part-iii.html">of</a> <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/05/you-knew-id-say-something-part-iv.html">blog</a> <a href="http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/05/you-knew-id-say-something-part-v.html">posts</a> that made me reconsider my view &#8211; while self-calls might &#8220;only&#8221; be loops, mutual, never-ending tail-calls implement continuation-passing style, state machines etc. Â Glad I got one more erroneous belief out of my system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://constantly.at/2009/05/on-tail-recursion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Public Service Announcement</title>
		<link>http://constantly.at/2008/02/public-service-announcement/</link>
		<comments>http://constantly.at/2008/02/public-service-announcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rudi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lisp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constantly.at/blog/2008/02/05/public-service-announcement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you compile sbcl from source yourself, and you want to have threading enabled, then look at the top of the file base-target-features.lisp-expr and do what it says therein.
Thank you.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you compile sbcl from source yourself, and you want to have threading enabled, then look at the top of the file base-target-features.lisp-expr and do what it says therein.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://constantly.at/2008/02/public-service-announcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
